What were our aims?

The aim of this research was to look closely at these services, to specifically examine the culture of care for young people receiving cancer care in England. The current economic climate of the National Health Service presents an ongoing challenge for specialist health services to demonstrate their value and cost-effectiveness: teenage and young adult cancer care being one of these specialist services. Evidence to underpin specialist health services is crucial to make a difference and sustain change.

What did we do?

Adopting a case study approach through a critical realist lens, this multi-site case study was conducted across four teenage and young adult cancer networks in England. It used a qualitative, multi-method approach across 24 NHS hospitals, and included: semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals (n=41), and young people (n=29); focussed ethnography, walking tours and shadowing techniques. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes between, within and across the four cases; deconstructing and reconstructing the components of the culture of care that emerged thereby enabling synthesis and contextualisation of data.

What were our findings?

The findings of this study are presented in three parts, framed around the three core concepts of culture: the dynamic contexts of the culture; the visible processes and less visible values which underpin the culture; and the way the culture was learned and shared. The first part of the findings from this study to be published looked at the term ‘age-appropriate care’ and explored how it can be conceptualised. To read the open-access paper, visit this link. Additionally, the narrative review of the literature which underpinned the case study has been published, accessible via this link

Further findings from this case study will be published in 2020.

©2022 This website presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme (Grant Reference Number RP-PG-1209-10013). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly.Update my browser now